
Click here for printer friendly page
Background checks: Proceed with caution14/06/2004. Source: Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault. Adam Forman and Robert Kilroy 
High profile events of the last few years, including the corporate accounting scandals and September 11, have forever changed the US business landscape. One important change is that employers are seeking to learn more about the backgrounds of applicants and employees. This is equally true of private equity investors, which are increasingly insisting on background checks for management teams as part of their due diligence, according to Adam Forman and Robert Kilroy of Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault. Events over the last several years, including the corporate accounting scandals,
the September 11, 2001 tragedy and highly publicized episodes of workplace violence,
have forever changed the U.S. business landscape. One important change is that
employers are seeking to learn more about the backgrounds of applicants and employees
in the hopes of ferreting out those who cannot be entrusted with management responsibilities
or oversight of financial matters, as well as those who present potential security
risks.
In attempting to meet these concerns, employers increasingly have been requesting
background checks on both applicants and current employees. Moreover, private
equity investors as well as strategic vendors, such as auditors, have also begun
insisting on background checks for management teams as part of their due diligence
before providing financing or services. When properly conducted, background
checks provide a valuable source of information for use in employment-related
and investment decision-making. Employers and private equity investors using
such investigative techniques, however, must ensure that they comply with the
Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") and any state law counterparts.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act. The FCRA imposes notice, consent and
reporting obligations upon an employer who requests reports on applicants or
current employees from a consumer reporting agency. There are two types of reports
that an employer may seek - "Consumer Reports" and "Investigative
Consumer Reports." Consumer Reports include information bearing on the
individual's creditworthiness, character, general reputation, personal characteristics
or mode of living. Investigative Consumer Reports include the same type of information
found in Consumer Reports, but the information is gained through personal interviews
with neighbours, friends, associates or others with whom the individual is acquainted,
as well as publicly-available sources. In other words, Consumer Reports are
background checks based on a search of records, and Investigative Consumer Reports
include both a records search and interviews of people who may possess relevant
information about the applicant/employee.
Notably, the FCRA only applies to instances in which the Consumer Reports and
Investigative Consumer Reports are produced by a "consumer reporting agency."
Thus, an employer that conducts its own reference checks is not subject to the
FCRA. Likewise, an employer conducting an Internet search for publicly available
information on an applicant/employee is not subject to the FCRA. If, however,
an employer relies on a reference checking or investigatory agency for this
type of information, the employer will be subject to the FCRA's requirements.
Obtaining a Consumer Report. Before requesting a Consumer Report on
an applicant/employee from a consumer reporting agency, the employer must provide
the applicant/employee with a stand-alone document which clearly discloses that
a Consumer Report may be obtained for employment purposes and obtains the applicant's/employee's
written authorization. This authorization should be maintained in the employee's
personnel file.
Obtaining an Investigative Consumer Report. Before requesting an Investigative
Consumer Report, the employer must (1) comply with the requirements for obtaining
a Consumer Report and (2) disclose to the applicant/employee in writing that
an Investigative Consumer Report may be made; that the applicant/employee has
a right to a complete disclosure of the nature and scope of the investigation
requested; and that the applicant/employee has a right to a written summary
of his rights under the FCRA.
If the applicant/employee exercises these rights, the employer must provide
this information within five days from receipt of the request or the date the
Investigative Consumer Report was requested, whichever is later. The disclosure
of the nature and scope of the investigation will differ depending on each applicant/employee,
and therefore must be done on a case-by-case basis. The summary of rights under
the FCRA, however, is a standard document, entitled "A Summary of Your
Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act."
Taking Adverse Action Based on a Report. If an employer relies, even
in part, upon a Consumer Report or Investigative Consumer Report when taking
adverse action against an applicant/employee (e.g., decision not to hire, denial
of promotion, discharge of employee), the employer, prior to taking the action,
must provide the applicant/employee with a "pre-adverse action disclosure"
that includes a copy of the individual's report and the summary of rights document
described above.
After taking the adverse action, the employer must make certain additional
disclosures to the applicant/employee, including notice of the adverse action
taken; the name, address, and telephone number of the consumer reporting agency
that made the report; and notice of the individual's right to dispute with the
consumer reporting agency the accuracy or completeness of any information the
agency furnished. The two-step procedure contemplated by the FCRA - a pre-adverse
action disclosure and then the additional disclosures - is often unwieldy. As
a practical matter, an employer can meet these requirements by consolidating
the process and all of the required information into a single disclosure prior
to taking the adverse action.
Pre-Investment Due Diligence. Obligations under the FCRA may be triggered
outside of the employment context. For example, a private equity firm that wants
to obtain Consumer Reports or Investigative Consumer Reports for founders or
management of a company prior to making an investment also may have obligations
under the FCRA. The FCRA does not specifically address the obligations of potential
investors in this circumstance. In the absence of definitive guidelines, private
equity investors are well advised to comply with the consent and disclosure
obligations applicable to employers under the FCRA in connection with investment-related
background checks. Of course, private equity firms also must comply with the
FCRA when doing background checks on the firm's own employees.
Penalties. Failure to comply with the requirements of the FCRA can result
in civil liability in the form of actual damages sustained by the applicant/employee,
punitive damages (in the case of wilful non-compliance), and imposition of costs
and attorneys' fees. Additionally, it is a felony to procure a Consumer Report
under false pretences. If convicted, the person who knowingly and wilfully obtained
the information is subject to a fine, imprisonment for up to two years, or both.
Conclusion. Background checks are an increasingly important part of
employers' hiring processes and investors' due diligence investigations. However,
it is important for employers and investors to comply with FCRA obligations
in the course of obtaining this useful background information.
This article is reproduced with permission of Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault,
LLP. For more information about Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP, please
contact www.tht.com
© Testa, Huwitz & Thibeault, LLP. All Rights Reserved

|